Switch is a character in The Matrix that was originally written to gender swap between the real world and The Matrix: Warner Brothers mistakenly nixed this idea, choosing to portray this character as androgynous to pay homage to that concept of gender-bending. It was recently reported that Lily Wachowski confirmed a fan theory is that Switch was, in Lily’s words, a “trans-metaphor” into their (Lily and her sister Lana) struggles with gender identity.
We can reasonably infer why Warner Brothers ruined this clever idea of Switch’s “residual self-image,“a phrase expressed in the film that helps establish its cyberpunk creditial. Either WB themselves did not like the idea of Switch having a residual self-image that is the opposite sex or they thought that the audience would be intolerant of this same idea is still essentially transphobic. Keeping the original concept of Switch was an opporunity missed; to be more inclusive of the transgender community, presenting them in a normalized way. It also blocked avenues for creativity to stay more original throughout the movie production process. You can say the true Switch was “cancelled,” but for less than ethical reasons.
Identity-control is the crux of identity politics. Reasonable, sensible, likable or not, a particular identity should be in control of the person who possesses and embodies it. Think of hate speech in general, the misinformation and disinformation about racial and sexual minorities,women, and gender minorities. There are political reasons why stereotypes and stigmas are consistently promoted and enforced, even decades after those stereotypes and stigmas are proven wrong. It’s about control and don’t think people in power are unaware of the influence they possess in shaping social perception. The ability to control one’s identity is pivotal to self-determination.
Transgender and androgynous characters are still rare and often obscured in pop culture. I find Switch a refreshing archytpe of how adrogynous characters could be portrayed: fashionable, likeable, and bad-ass.
-Apollo 8, the first manned mission to the moon, entered lunar orbit on Christmas Eve, Dec. 24, 1968. That evening, the astronauts-Commander Frank Borman, Command Module Pilot Jim Lovell, and Lunar Module Pilot William Anders-held a live broadcast from lunar orbit, in which they showed pictures of the Earth and moon as seen from their spacecraft. Said Lovell, “The vast loneliness is awe-inspiring and it makes you realize just what you have back there on Earth.” They ended the broadcast with the crew taking turns reading from the book of Genesis.-
This is one of the most beautiful and possibly the most meaningful photo ever taken. Let us fight every day for it.
When I was in college years ago I remember reading that political apathy being one of the greatest threats to democracies, especially to modern liberal types. It probably still is. Think of it. How can democracies work if the governed don’t care to even give their consent? What happens to the quality of the democracy when constituents feel too comfortable with their own lives, or when they believe an afterlife is more important than politics, or when they don’t fully realize their own self-interest, or when they just “feel” disenfranchised?
The educated vote at higher ratios than the less educated. But for how decently educated America is, I don’t think our voting turnouts for the last 50 years have matched. I may be wrong. Records show that barely over 50% of our VAP (voting age population) have voted in the last 20 years. Then if education won’t cut it, then what could help?
ANGER. It’s a great motivator. In some ways it’s better than conscious, and rational, and deliberate action. The former can get you off the couch and on your feet in less than a second. The later, whilst can give time for contemplation, might be interrupted by the next commercial or be forgotten by tomorrow’s end. Anger can help you remember because anger leaves brain-waffling impressions in your mind. Dwelling on the anger does make you think, which is not to say it naturally comes with fair-mindedness followed by some sort of enlightenment, and makes you reassess the things you care about. Is this way, anger has it’s political uses.
Is it possible that Trump can help drive voter turnout for Democrats in numbers that can shatter the elections of 2008 and 2012? Whether or not Trump wins 2020, I doubt his supporters will fade way. Remember, Trump is more the symptom than the cause. Demoralized, yes. Less fanaticized, I think it’s only going to get worse.
Mobilizing the people who would vote against you is less than getting your agenda done without them noticing. I have heard that Trump’s tactic relies on creating dumpster fires to distract you from the bigger fire elsewhere. The importance of this is to put out both fires, albeit starting with the more dangerous one first, if you have no choice to prioritize. But if the dumpster fires churns out swarms of apathetic people to leave their houses, then who does it really help?